You successfully added to your cart! You can either continue shopping, or checkout now if you'd like.
Note: If you'd like to continue shopping, you can always access your cart from the icon at the upper-right of every page.
Is a new precedent being set?
I’m no fan of drugs, legal or illegal. I’m no fan of any scientist that alters creation so that he can patent it for personal gain.
However, having said that, the drug called chloroquine has been approved by the FDA for decades, and now politicians want to ban its use on the coronavirus. Excuse me, but isn’t that for the FDA to decide? Better yet, doesn't a medical license give doctors the right to determine treatment for their patients? Are some politicians trying to keep people from a treatment in order to make the situation worse, in hopes that it will harm Trump’s chances for reelection in November?
Governor Gretchen Whitmer from the Michigan Directorate has threatened to turn the eye of the state upon any doctor or pharmacist who would attempt to prescribe chloroquine to treat their patients suffering from coronavirus. Medical licenses may need to be revoked.
The agency’s March 24 letter warns physicians and pharmacists of professional consequences for the prescribing of hydroxychloroquine (and chloroquine). Beyond the rational recommendation against hoarding, the letter includes threats of “administrative action” against the licenses of doctors that prescribe hydroxychloroquine.
The governors of Michigan and Nevada, both Democrats, are trying to ban chloroquinine, as if doctors don’t know what they are doing. This looks like politicians are practicing medicine without a license.
Impeachment, perhaps?